Did The Children Of Yesterdays Generation Get Better Parenting Then Todays Children Are Getting

To comp be the earlier extension with the present generation is unfair. composition there may be some truth to the assertions that the moral foundations that keep been instilled in the antecedent generation atomic number 18 degrading, the antecedent facts and circumstances meet the two generations are certain(prenominal)ly much different. Yesterdays children are now todays parents and to assert that the method of parenting has e poleed in the span of a single generation is to belittle the heralded parenting that the previous generation has given.To sustain an argument in this line of thinking would be to suggest that the next generation will have even little of a moral foundation than todays generation. This is hardly the slickness and nobody would like to see that it will happen. The reason that it may search this way is because of perception and the significant changes that have occurred in society in such a short period of time. Any generation has a tendency to perceiv e themselves differently from other generations. The line of Stanley reflects this sentiment, The world is non the way it used to be when I was growing up.This thinking may obtain from the inherent need of people of unendingly compare themselves with others to sire out their true identity or it may also be because of the generational identity that forces others to see those non belonging to a certain generation to be different. Whatever the reason is, the fact is that similitudes will always be made amongst the previous generation and the present generation. This comparison is non altogether with regard to the moral foundations or upbringing and will extend to other aspects such as successes and failures.There may not really be such a huge difference between the previous generation and the present generation just now this is soaringlighted more by the fact that inter-generational communication has a tendency to create a bigger gap between the two. The problem that this c reates is that what the present generation perceives as the average and what they perceive as morally judgeable is different from what the previous generation perceives. What was once considered taboo, such as sex, is now discussed openly and even taught to principal(a) children.To argue which side of the issue is moral is an impossible task. The line of Natasha shows this when she argues against bodily punishment. Who is to say all that corporal punishment back then was the in force(p) way to raise kids though? It is lightsome that both sides could sooner come to an agreement if there was a bump way of communicating with severally other. The other reason why it may seem that the children of yesterday acquire better parenting than todays generation is because of the rapidly changing world. further they are not being raised the selfsame(prenominal) way, Andy insisted, because society wint allow it. The point of Andy is easily taken and the circumstances are very differen t now than they were before. When the parents of the previous generation had time decorous to spend with their children, todays generation does not have the same benefit. The difference in the way social interactions occur is also a factor because the present technology allows people to communicate without even sightedness each other.This matter accounts for a lot when it comes to parenting because the access that todays communication technology provides means that children are more open to outside(a) sources or influences than they previously were. Despite all of what is happening, the method of parenting has not changed so radically so as to suggest that yesterdays generation received better parenting because, as mentioned earlier, the parents of today where yesterdays children and the methods of parenting that they occupy today are but the methods that they themselves learned from their own parents.To apply the numerical theory of transitivity, if todays parenting is bad and the parents today were taught by the previous generation, therefore the previous generation also used bad parenting. As Natasha put it, My sister and I used to get whippings all the time. I ended up in college and she ended up in jail. why did that happen? We should have turned out the same. I never pound my kids when they were growing up, and today they are both straight A high school students. Thats why that old saying spare the rod and spoil the child never made any sense to me. It is clear therefore that such is not the case. Every generation not only seeks to raise their children the way that they themselves were raised but they also strive to change state better parents than their parents ever were to them. The real issue therefore may not really be that yesterdays generation received better parenting than the present generation but that there is a reluctance to accept the influence of the societal changes that have taken place as well as the manner by which technology has r adically changed every view of our lives, even the way parenting is done.The question is not so much whether or not a child should be given a trounce or whatever positive reinforcement or method exists but whether or not the problems of the current generation are being addressed. changing times call for changing methods. Issues once considered taboo may be considered as acceptable under todays norms and may be even the parenting that was considered as the standard may be considered out of tincture with reality for the next generation.